ElectronJS vs NW.js: Which Framework Should You Use to Build a Desktop App in 2025?

ElectronJS vs NW.js: Which Framework Should You Use to Build a Desktop App in 2025?

Author: Abdulkader Safi

Position: Software Engineer

Building a desktop application with web technologies (HTML, CSS, and JavaScript) has never been easier — but the real question is: Should you use ElectronJS or NW.js (Node-Webkit)?

Both frameworks empower developers to ship cross-platform desktop apps using familiar web stacks, yet they differ in architecture, performance, and developer experience.

In this guide, we’ll break down ElectronJS vs NW.js with code examples, performance insights, and practical recommendations.


Quick Overview

Feature ElectronJS NW.js (Node-Webkit)
Architecture Chromium + Node.js runtime (separate processes) Web runtime with Node integrated into the same process
Entry Point main.js (main process) launches a renderer window package.json defines main HTML entry point
Integration Model Node APIs exposed via IPC (Inter-Process Communication) Node APIs directly accessible in DOM
Performance Slightly higher memory usage, better stability Lower startup time, heavier memory coupling
Community Larger (used by VSCode, Slack, Discord) Smaller, but older and stable
Use Case Fit Large-scale, modular apps Lightweight, quick prototypes or internal tools

Architecture Differences

ElectronJS: Separation of Concerns

ElectronJS follows a multi-process model, similar to Chrome:

  • The main process controls the app lifecycle and windows.
  • Each renderer process runs web pages (your UI).

This separation ensures crash isolation and better debugging but introduces IPC complexity.

Example: main.js

const { app, BrowserWindow } = require("electron");

function createWindow() {
  const win = new BrowserWindow({
    width: 800,
    height: 600,
    webPreferences: { nodeIntegration: true },
  });

  win.loadFile("index.html");
}

app.whenReady().then(createWindow);

NW.js: Simpler, Integrated Model

NW.js embeds Node.js directly into the browser context, letting you call Node APIs from any script inside your webpage — no IPC required.

Example: package.json

{
  "name": "nwjs-demo",
  "main": "index.html",
  "window": {
    "width": 800,
    "height": 600
  }
}

Example: index.html

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <title>NW.js App</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Hello NW.js</h1>
    <script>
      const fs = require("fs");
      fs.writeFileSync("hello.txt", "Hello from NW.js!");
    </script>
  </body>
</html>

This simplicity makes NW.js excellent for rapid prototypes and internal tooling, but can be harder to maintain for large, modular apps.


Developer Experience

ElectronJS Advantages

  • Powerful API ecosystem (auto-updates, crash reporting, tray, notifications).
  • Backed by GitHub and OpenJS Foundation.
  • Works seamlessly with TypeScript, React, Vue, and Vite.
  • Easier CI/CD integrations (Electron Builder).

NW.js Advantages

  • Instant Node access in browser — perfect for scripting-heavy apps.
  • Faster to get started (no manual main process).
  • Great for offline utilities, kiosks, and embedded dashboards.

Performance Considerations

Metric ElectronJS NW.js
Startup Time Slower due to process creation Faster (single process)
Memory Footprint Larger but stable under load Smaller but shared resources
Security Stronger isolation Requires careful sandboxing
Build Size ~150MB typical ~120MB typical

💡 Pro tip: For Electron apps, disable unnecessary Chromium features and preload only essential modules to optimize startup time.


Example: AI Chat Desktop App (with OpenAI API)

Let’s create a minimal AI chatbot desktop app with

ElectronJS

main.js

const { app, BrowserWindow, ipcMain } = require("electron");
const fetch = require("node-fetch");

ipcMain.handle("askAI", async (event, prompt) => {
  const res = await fetch("https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions", {
    method: "POST",
    headers: {
      Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY}`,
      "Content-Type": "application/json",
    },
    body: JSON.stringify({
      model: "gpt-4o-mini",
      messages: [{ role: "user", content: prompt }],
    }),
  });
  const data = await res.json();
  return data.choices[0].message.content;
});

function createWindow() {
  const win = new BrowserWindow({
    width: 600,
    height: 400,
    webPreferences: { preload: "./preload.js" },
  });
  win.loadFile("index.html");
}

app.whenReady().then(createWindow);

preload.js

const { contextBridge, ipcRenderer } = require("electron");

contextBridge.exposeInMainWorld("ai", {
  ask: (prompt) => ipcRenderer.invoke("askAI", prompt),
});

index.html

<input id="prompt" placeholder="Ask the AI..." />
<button onclick="ask()">Send</button>
<pre id="output"></pre>

<script>
  async function ask() {
    const prompt = document.getElementById("prompt").value;
    const response = await window.ai.ask(prompt);
    document.getElementById("output").textContent = response;
  }
</script>

This example demonstrates how Electron handles secure AI integrations, isolating Node operations from the browser context — something NW.js does more directly but with more risk.


Packaging & Distribution

Electron

Use electron-builder:

npx electron-builder --mac --win --linux

Generates installers, icons, auto-updates, and more — perfect for production.

NW.js

Use nw-builder:

npx nwbuild --platforms win64,linux64,osx64 .

Smaller ecosystem, but still reliable for simpler deployment.


When to Choose Which

Choose ElectronJS if

  • You’re building a complex, large-scale app (e.g., VS Code, Slack).
  • You need auto-updates, crash reporting, or sandboxed security.
  • You want strong community support and continuous maintenance.

Choose NW.js if

  • You need fast prototyping or lightweight tools.
  • You prefer Node-in-browser simplicity.
  • Your app doesn’t rely heavily on modular security boundaries.

Final Verdict

Both ElectronJS and NW.js let you create desktop apps that feel native — but:

  • ElectronJS: is the industry standard, ideal for scalable, production-ready applications.
  • NW.js: remains a great choice for quick, integrated, or embedded use cases.

👉 Recommendation: Start with ElectronJS unless you have a specific reason to prefer NW.js’s simpler model.


🤝 Need a Custom RSVP System or Dashboard?

I help businesses build tools that actually work , even on tight deadlines.

Whether you're planning an event, need internal tools, or want a custom dashboard for your team , I can help.

Reach out

📧 Email: safi.abdulkader@gmail.com | 💻 LinkedIn: @abdulkader-safi | 📱 Instagram: @abdulkader.safi | 🏢 DSRPT

Drop me a line, I’m always happy to collaborate! 🚀


© Abdulkader Safi